TQR Ready Review Comments
As an editorial board, we are committed to helping authors improve their qualitative
research reporting and to publishing articles that reflect the best quality in qualitative
research. We acknowledge that there is great variety in qualitative research and the
reporting of results from these inquiries, and our position on what constitutes quality in
these areas has evolved over the years as we have learned from the practice of reading
and reviewing the papers submitted to the journal, as well as from our review of articles
published in other journals and prescriptions for quality in qualitative research shared
through published articles, books, and book chapters. In reviewing papers for potential
publication in The Qualitative Report (TQR), we encourage authors to report the findings
of their qualitative research studies using what we as editors have selected as “best
practices” in contemporary qualitative research practice and presentation.
TQR for Reviewers Presentation 2022
Instructions and tips on how to work within the BEPRESS Manuscript system to review a paper.
Reporting QDA Results Well Presentation
We designed this presentation to help our editors and reviewers learn the TQR approach to helping authors improve their articles and to learn and utilize best practices in reporting their research studies. We also hope authors consult these resources as they prepare their papers for submission. As a learning community, we feel our mission is not only to help authors learn how to write better, reviewers how to review better, and editors how to edit better, but also to help our readers to appreciate the aesthetic qualities of a paper well-written. Please feel free to use these resources in your teaching and learning!
Constructing Editorial Comments
Constructing Editorial Comments Collaboratively or Meaningful Moments in the Margins